もんどう問答mondou
1.

A process of exchanging questions and answers, often involving debate or discussion between two parties, where one poses a question and the other responds, fostering a dynamic dialogue.

2.

In a Buddhist context, a practice where a disciple asks the master questions, and the master provides answers, which serves as an essential method for educating students within the Zen tradition.

3.

A form of discourse characterized by back-and-forth questioning and responding, which may include philosophical or religious arguments and discussions, highlighting the importance of dialogue in understanding and resolving differing views.

もんどうむよう問答無用mondoumuyou
1.

A situation in which further discussion or debate is futile and unproductive, often because the outcome is already predetermined or obvious.

2.

The state of affairs where no matter the arguments or reasoning presented, they will not affect the outcome or decision at hand.

3.

An acknowledgment that certain issues or questions hold no value in discussion, often implying a finality to the matter at hand.

oshiもんどう問答mondou
1.

A situation in which two parties repeatedly express their opposing views without conceding, leading to a back-and-forth exchange.

2.

An argument characterized by persistent disagreement and stubbornness, where each side vigorously defends their stance until one party eventually gives way.

3.

A verbal exchange that resembles a tug-of-war, where each participant attempts to outlast the other in their insistence on their point of view.

Example:

ここで意味のない押し問答を続けては・・・昨日の繰り返しですわね。

ぜんもんどう禅問答zenmondou
1.

A form of dialogue practiced in Zen Buddhism in which monks engage in challenging and abstract questions and answers aimed at deepening understanding and achieving enlightenment.

2.

A type of discussion characterized by perplexing and seemingly nonsensical exchanges that may be difficult for outsiders to comprehend, often serving a reflective or meditative purpose.

3.

An esoteric communication style employed in Zen monasteries, where questions and answers may lead to deeper insights rather than straightforward responses, often inviting participants to explore their own thoughts and perceptions.