The process of carefully evaluating an individual's qualifications, achievements, or the quality of an item to determine its acceptability or classification.
A systematic assessment aimed at establishing the value, merit, or appropriateness of something, often involving specific criteria or standards.
An official procedure through which submissions or applications are scrutinized to decide on approval or rejection, commonly used in contexts like academic or professional evaluations.
Example:
彼の作品を審査するときには、彼の経験不足を考慮に入れなければならない。
A person appointed to evaluate the quality or performance of participants in a competition or event, often responsible for scoring or providing feedback.
An individual who reviews submissions or performances to determine their merit, adherence to standards, or eligibility for an award or recognition.
Example:
その学生は、自分の弁論に対して審査員が批判的に述べたことをひどく気にした。
A process of reviewing a previously made decision or assessment, often involving a thorough evaluation of the evidence and arguments presented.
A formal opportunity to reconsider a case or matter, typically in a judicial or administrative context, aimed at ensuring fairness and accuracy in the outcome.
The act of subjecting a prior judgment or evaluation to a new level of scrutiny, often prompted by new information or concerns about the original decision's validity.
A professional responsible for evaluating and assessing the qualifications, claims, or submissions in a specific field, often involved in approving or rejecting applications based on set criteria.
An individual appointed to review and judge the merit of documents or proposals, ensuring compliance with established standards and regulations.
A person who conducts thorough investigations or inspections to determine the legitimacy and accuracy of submissions in legal, academic, or administrative contexts.
A mechanism through which citizens evaluate and determine the appropriateness of Supreme Court judges in Japan, typically conducted during general elections for the House of Representatives.
An official process that allows the public to assess whether appointed judges are fit for their roles, potentially leading to their removal if a majority of votes favor dismissal.
A constitutional right for the populace to hold public officials accountable, specifically targeting the suitability of Supreme Court justices, reflecting the principles of democratic governance.