A systematic method of reasoning that enables one to derive correct conclusions based on given premises or conditions.
The coherent relationships and causal connections that help explain phenomena in a rational and unified manner.
The study of patterns in reasoning that seeks to achieve accurate understanding and judgment, often focusing on formal aspects of reasoning.
Example:
どうするかを決めるときは、論理ではなく本能を当てにする。
Pertaining to a systematic method of thinking that follows a clear progression from premises to conclusions, allowing for sound reasoning and well-structured arguments.
Characterized by reasoning that is coherent and consistent, ensuring that conclusions drawn are justifiable based on the provided statements or evidence.
Reflecting the ability to understand relationships between various concepts through rational interpretation, often employing rules of logic to reach valid outcomes.
Describing a manner of thought or expression that is organized and comprehensible, where ideas are articulated in a way that is easy to follow and substantiated by reasoning.
Demonstrating an adherence to principles of rational thought, often used in contexts that require critical analysis or evaluation of ideas.
Example:
人間だけに論理的思考力がある。
Describes a situation or idea that lacks clear reasoning or logical coherence, often leading to conclusions that are not supported by rational argumentation.
Refers to thoughts or actions that deviate from accepted principles of logic, making them difficult to understand or follow rationally.
Characterizes beliefs, theories, or arguments that do not align with logical deduction, often resulting in contradictions or irrationality.
A branch of study focused on uncovering the principles and forms of reasoning that enable correct judgments and understanding.
An academic discipline that analyzes the structure of arguments and the relationships between premises and conclusions, often distinguishing between formal logic and epistemological approaches.
The exploration of rational thought processes that aim to form valid conclusions based on given conditions and their logical implications.
A field that addresses the methodology of reasoning, examining how phenomena can be interpreted through coherent and unified causal relationships, often intersecting with other philosophical inquiries like ontology and epistemology.
Example:
とりわけ、論理学には正確な定義が要求される。
A field of study that examines the principles and systems of reasoning, focusing specifically on the structure and validity of arguments, rather than the content of the arguments themselves.
An academic discipline that investigates the formal aspects of inference and reasoning, particularly in relation to deductive reasoning patterns such as syllogisms, and addresses concepts, propositions, and fallacies.
A branch of logic that emphasizes the importance of form and procedure in argumentation, wherein the correctness of conclusions is derived from defined premises through established logical rules, often in contrast to informal or content-based logic.
A theoretical framework for evaluating the legitimacy of logical arguments by analyzing their formal structures, typically referencing historical contributions from philosophers like Aristotle, and later evolving into a mathematically rigorous tradition in modern symbolic logic.